Polygon’s Coinme and Sequence Acquisitions Reveal a Deeper Fight Over Who Controls Stablecoin Payments

Polygon’s Coinme and Sequence Acquisitions Reveal a Deeper Fight Over Who Controls Stablecoin Payments

Polygon Labs’ purchases of Coinme and Sequence show a strategic shift toward owning stablecoin payment infrastructure, bringing licensing, wallets, and compliance closer to the core of blockchain finance.

 


 

Discover top fintech news and events!

Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter

Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more

 


 

 

Polygon’s Bet Goes Beyond Crypto Startups

Polygon Labs closed deals to acquire Coinme and Sequence for more than $250 million in total. The company declined to release a breakdown of the purchase prices or payment structure. Executives at Polygon said the acquisitions support the company’s stablecoin strategy.

That statement deserves closer attention. Stablecoins now sit at the center of the debate over digital payments. Banks, payment processors, and technology firms all see them as a possible upgrade to existing settlement systems. Polygon’s move places it directly in that contest.

Coinme operates cash-to-crypto services and holds money transmitter licenses in the United States. Sequence builds wallet and blockchain infrastructure. Together, these businesses cover two areas that blockchain networks often leave to outside partners: regulated onboarding and user-facing tools.

This signals a shift in how Polygon sees its role. The company is moving from being a network provider to becoming an operator of payment infrastructure.

 

Stablecoins Are Pulling Blockchain Firms Into the Payments Business

For years, blockchain companies focused on throughput, transaction fees, and developer adoption. Stablecoins changed that focus.

Stablecoins turn blockchain systems into payment tools rather than trading venues. That change forces companies to deal with regulation, compliance, and customer access. It also puts them in competition with traditional fintech platforms that already operate under these constraints.

Polygon’s acquisitions reflect this pressure. A blockchain network alone cannot support everyday payment use at scale. It needs licensed access to fiat systems and tools that businesses and consumers can use without technical friction.

Coinme brings regulated bridges between cash and crypto. Sequence provides wallet technology and developer infrastructure. Polygon already runs the network layer. Combined, these pieces move the company closer to operating a complete payment stack.

 

Coinme Adds Regulatory Weight to Polygon’s Strategy

Coinme’s main value lies in its licensing footprint. Money transmitter licenses allow the company to operate in regulated payment markets across the United States. That legal foundation matters more than its ATM presence.

Stablecoin adoption depends on regulatory acceptance. Large companies and institutions will not route payments through systems that cannot meet reporting and compliance standards. Polygon’s decision to acquire Coinme shows recognition of this reality.

Coinme also carries regulatory history. California and Washington regulators targeted the company in 2025 over violations tied to ATM withdrawal limits. Washington later agreed to stay a cease-and-desist order. Polygon’s chief executive said the company’s compliance practices go beyond minimum requirements.

That response highlights the challenge Polygon now faces. Payment infrastructure brings oversight. Oversight brings risk. The company is choosing to operate where scrutiny is constant.

 

Sequence Brings Control Over the User Layer

Wallet infrastructure often receives less attention than networks and tokens. In practice, wallets determine how users interact with digital money.

Sequence builds wallets and developer tools that support blockchain applications. This gives Polygon influence over how stablecoins are stored, authorized, and integrated into services.

In traditional finance, banks control customer accounts. In digital finance, wallets play a similar role. Control over wallets affects identity checks, transaction approvals, and access to financial products.

By acquiring Sequence, Polygon gains leverage over this layer. It reduces reliance on external wallet providers and creates room to build direct relationships with users and businesses.

This is a strategic move. Payment adoption depends on user experience as much as technical capability.

 

The Stripe Comparison Signals a Larger Rivalry

Polygon’s founder compared the company’s approach to Stripe’s recent moves in stablecoins and blockchain. That comparison is revealing.

Stripe built global payment infrastructure long before entering crypto. It later acquired stablecoin and wallet companies and supported its own blockchain focused on payments. Stripe’s goal has been clear: control the payment stack end to end.

Polygon is taking the opposite route. It already operates blockchain infrastructure. Now it is buying the layers that connect blockchain to real-world payments.

This puts Polygon and similar blockchain firms into direct competition with established fintech companies. The contest is no longer about ideology or decentralization debates. It is about who offers faster settlement, lower costs, and better compliance support.

Payment markets reward reliability. They reward scale. They reward trust. Blockchain firms that want a place in this market must meet the same standards as traditional payment processors.

 

The NFT Era Is Giving Way to Payment Utility

Polygon gained public attention during the NFT surge of 2021 and 2022. That period brought transaction volume and visibility, but it did not establish long-term payment relevance.

The company’s recent focus on stablecoins, payments, and hiring Stripe’s former head of crypto signals a different direction. Polygon is pivoting toward financial utility rather than entertainment-driven activity.

This reflects a broader adjustment across the crypto sector. Projects built around speculative demand face declining interest. Projects focused on financial services attract institutional attention.

Stablecoins sit at the center of this shift. They offer a practical use case that fits business needs. That makes them more attractive to banks, regulators, and enterprises.

 

Infrastructure Is Becoming the Main Battlefield

The stablecoin race is being decided by infrastructure control.

Payment systems require onboarding, compliance checks, custody solutions, settlement rails, and reporting tools. These functions determine whether businesses adopt a platform.

Polygon’s acquisitions show a move toward owning these components rather than outsourcing them. This reduces dependence on partners whose priorities may differ. It also increases responsibility.

Infrastructure ownership brings higher operating costs and regulatory exposure. It also creates competitive advantage when executed well.

Traditional payment firms already understand this model. Blockchain companies now face the same reality.

 

Fintech and Blockchain Are Moving Toward the Same Ground

The line between fintech platforms and blockchain networks continues to blur. Fintech companies integrate crypto services. Blockchain firms acquire licensed payment providers.

Polygon’s strategy fits this convergence. The company is building capabilities that resemble those of payment processors rather than open-source network projects.

This convergence changes how success is measured. Developer adoption matters less than transaction volume. Community engagement matters less than enterprise integration.

Stablecoin adoption will favor companies that offer full-service payment tools rather than isolated blockchain products.

 

Risks Follow the Opportunity

Polygon’s strategy carries operational risk. Integrating acquired companies is complex. Regulatory environments evolve. Payment failures draw immediate attention.

Coinme’s past regulatory issues highlight the importance of strong compliance governance. Wallet infrastructure brings cybersecurity responsibilities. Custody systems face constant threat from fraud and technical failure.

These risks do not disappear because blockchain technology is involved. They increase when systems handle real money flows.

Polygon’s leadership appears willing to accept these challenges. The acquisitions indicate a long-term view rather than a short-term experiment.

 

Institutional Adoption Depends on Control and Clarity

Large institutions require stable systems. They expect auditability, clear governance, and predictable performance.

Polygon’s move toward full-stack infrastructure suggests the company wants to serve institutional clients, not only retail users and developers. Control over onboarding and wallets makes it easier to offer enterprise-grade services.

This approach also supports partnerships with banks and payment providers that demand regulatory alignment.

Stablecoin adoption at scale will come from business integration.

 

What This Means for the Stablecoin Market

Polygon’s acquisitions signal that stablecoins are entering a new phase. The focus is shifting from experimentation to competition over payment control.

Companies that control access points and user tools will influence how stablecoins are used in trade, payroll, and cross-border settlement. This competition will unfold over years, not months.

Payment infrastructure does not change quickly. It requires trust built over long periods. Blockchain firms that want to compete must invest accordingly.

Polygon’s decision to spend more than $250 million on infrastructure suggests it understands the timeline.

 

A Turning Point in Blockchain Strategy

The Coinme and Sequence deals mark a turning point in how Polygon positions itself. The company is no longer acting solely as a builder of networks. It is stepping into the role of a payment infrastructure provider.

This move aligns Polygon with the operational realities of finance. It also exposes the company to the same pressures faced by banks and fintech firms.

Stablecoins will not succeed because they are new. They will succeed if they perform better than existing systems under real conditions.

Polygon has placed a clear bet on that future. The outcome will help determine whether blockchain firms can compete in the business of moving money, not just in the business of building networks.

 

Related Articles