Discover top fintech news and events!
Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter
Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more
JPMorgan’s New Fees for Fintechs Signal Major Shift in Data Access
JPMorgan Chase & Co. is preparing to charge financial technology companies for access to customer bank data — a decision that could significantly impact how the fintech sector operates. The change, still under discussion, is expected to affect hundreds of companies that rely on data aggregators to connect user accounts to apps and services.
If implemented, the move would represent one of the most consequential pricing shifts in U.S. digital finance in recent years. It targets a practice that underpins large parts of the fintech economy: free, behind-the-scenes data access to customer bank information. That access supports everything from payments and trading to crypto transactions and money transfers.
The planned charges would affect how fintech platforms access information through intermediaries, particularly data aggregators like Plaid and MX. These companies serve as infrastructure layers between banks and the growing network of consumer-facing financial apps. JPMorgan’s decision, communicated via pricing documents, sets a precedent that could ripple through the broader financial ecosystem.
What Is Changing — and Why It Matters
Until now, fintech platforms have been able to access consumer account information — including balances, deposits, and transaction history — without paying banks directly. That access has been facilitated by aggregators, which pull and transmit the data through APIs or secure login portals.
JPMorgan is now signaling that this system is no longer sustainable without compensation. According to people familiar with the matter, the bank has invested heavily in building secure, modern infrastructure to protect consumer data. The new fees are framed as a way to support that investment and ensure long-term platform stability.
The charges, which vary depending on how the data is used, will be higher for fintechs with payment capabilities. These include companies like Venmo, Coinbase, and Robinhood — all of which rely on account data to execute financial transactions. In some cases, the proposed fees could exceed the revenue that these firms generate per transaction, calling the profitability of certain services into question.
If passed on through aggregators, the new costs could ultimately be absorbed by fintechs themselves or passed on to consumers. Discussions between JPMorgan and aggregator firms are ongoing, and the pricing structure may still be adjusted before implementation.
The Regulatory Backdrop
The timing of JPMorgan’s move is closely tied to a pending regulatory decision. In October, a federal agency finalized a rule supporting open banking — a system that gives consumers the legal right to share their financial data with third-party services. The regulation aims to increase competition and expand access to financial tools by making it easier for customers to switch between providers.
While the rule promotes data mobility, it does not explicitly ban banks from charging for access to that data. This has left room for institutions like JPMorgan to argue that maintaining secure systems requires funding — and that they should be compensated accordingly.
The open-banking rule is currently under legal scrutiny. A restructured regulatory agency under former President Donald Trump has asked a federal court to cancel the measure, arguing that it creates legal and operational risks for banks. Financial institutions have also expressed concern that the rule may lead to increased fraud, with JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon publicly warning about the risks tied to unregulated data sharing.
The outcome of the legal challenge could directly impact whether and how banks like JPMorgan are permitted to charge for access. If the rule is upheld, it may limit their ability to impose fees; if overturned, it could embolden more institutions to follow suit.
Impact on the Fintech Sector
The implications for fintech firms are substantial. Many platforms, especially those operating at thin margins or offering free services, depend on seamless and low-cost access to user data. Introducing new fees — particularly at the scale described — could force some firms to rethink their offerings, raise prices, or seek alternative data sources.
For firms processing small-value transactions, the math becomes especially challenging. Larger firms may be better positioned to absorb the fees or renegotiate terms, but the broader trend suggests a potential consolidation in how data access is structured and paid for. It also raises questions about the long-term viability of open banking models in the U.S. if access is priced in a way that excludes smaller innovators.
A Test Case for the Future of Open Banking
JPMorgan’s approach could serve as a blueprint for other banks considering how to monetize their role in the fintech infrastructure chain. While the bank says it remains committed to customer safety and system investment, critics may argue that the charges could limit competition and put pressure on smaller players.
The current debate underscores a larger tension between established institutions and the technology firms that have built services on top of their systems. Open banking promised to shift the balance by giving consumers more control — but the financial models supporting that shift are now under strain.
With discussions still ongoing and regulatory uncertainty unresolved, the full impact of JPMorgan’s move won’t be clear for some time. What is clear is that a long-standing, invisible agreement — one in which fintechs operated on bank data without direct cost — is beginning to unravel.
As the fintech sector adapts to the possibility of data access becoming a paid service, companies may need to redesign their operations to accommodate a reality where information comes with a price tag. Whether this strengthens security and sustainability, or stifles innovation, will depend on how the final terms are shaped — and how the broader industry responds.
