FinTech moves fast. News is everywhere, clarity isn’t.
FinTech Weekly delivers the key stories and events in one place.
Click Here to Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's Newsletter
Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, BlackRock, Klarna and more.
A Pattern Nobody Announced
March 4, 2026. Zerohash, a Chicago-based crypto infrastructure company, filed paperwork with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) requesting a national trust bank charter. Most readers moved on.
Zerohash was the eleventh company to do exactly this in eighty-three days.
Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Paxos, Fidelity Digital Assets, Bridge (the stablecoin company Stripe acquired in 2024), Crypto.com, Protego, Morgan Stanley, and Payoneer all filed applications or received conditional approvals in the same window. Coinbase and World Liberty Financial have applications currently pending.
Eleven companies. Eighty-three days. No coordinated announcement. No shared press conference. The US financial system is being renegotiated through regulatory paperwork.
What a National Trust Bank Charter Actually Does
The OCC issues national trust bank charters under the authority of the National Bank Act. A national trust bank is not a full commercial bank. It cannot accept consumer deposits or issue loans as a primary function. Its core business is holding, managing, and custodying assets on behalf of clients. The license is valid across all fifty states, under a single federal regulator.
That federal reach is the point.
Without a federal charter, any crypto or fintech company doing business across the US must obtain a license from each state individually. Some states move fast. Others take years. Rules differ. A company fully licensed in fifty jurisdictions can find itself frozen in the fifty-first on a technicality. None of those state licenses offer protection against a change in administration, a new attorney general, or a regulatory reinterpretation.
A federal charter cuts through all of that. One regulator. One examination process. One set of rules.
The OCC currently supervises approximately sixty national trust banks. Existing ones already hold nearly two trillion dollars in custody and safekeeping accounts.
The Collapse of the Sponsor Bank Model
Most fintech companies in the US relied for years on a specific workaround. They partnered with licensed banks to access payment infrastructure and hold customer funds legally. These arrangements, known as sponsor bank relationships, allowed companies to operate without a banking license of their own. The banks took on regulatory exposure. The fintechs paid for access.
Federal regulators began scrutinizing these relationships aggressively in 2023 and 2024. Third-party oversight rules tightened. Several sponsor banks reduced or exited their fintech partnerships entirely. The companies that depended on them were left with fewer options, less leverage, and rising costs.
A federal trust charter removes the dependency. Companies gain direct access to the infrastructure they previously rented. The regulatory relationship becomes their own, not a partner's they cannot fully control.
That change in economics explains much of the timing.
December 12, 2025: The Day the Door Opened
The current wave started on a single day. On December 12, 2025, the OCC announced conditional approvals for five companies simultaneously: Ripple, Circle (filing as First National Digital Currency Bank), BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos. It was the first time the OCC had granted multiple crypto-native firms conditional charter approvals at once.
The five were not identical cases. Circle and Ripple filed as de novo applicants, building new entities from scratch. BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos converted from existing state trust companies. The OCC treated both paths as valid. That was a signal to the rest of the industry, and the industry responded quickly.
February brought three more conditional approvals: Bridge, Stripe's stablecoin infrastructure subsidiary, approved around February 12; Protego, approved in early February; and Crypto.com, approved February 23.
Then came the filings still awaiting approval. Morgan Stanley on February 18, proposing an entity called Morgan Stanley Digital Trust National Association. Payoneer on February 24. Zerohash on March 5.
Protego's Second Attempt
Protego's 2026 approval carries a detail worth noting. The company received a conditional OCC approval back in 2021, under the previous administration. It failed to meet the pre-conversion requirements before that approval expired.
The 2026 conditional approval is a second attempt, processed under a regulatory posture far more receptive to crypto applications than the one that let the first approval lapse.
Same company. Same application type. Completely different outcome.
The Rule That Takes Effect April 1
The OCC filed an amendment to its regulations on February 27, 2026. Published in the Federal Register on March 2, it replaces the term "fiduciary activities" in 12 CFR 5.20 with the phrase "operations of a trust company and activities related thereto," aligning the regulatory text with the statutory language in 12 U.S.C. 27(a). The rule takes effect April 1, 2026.
The practical effect is specific. A reading of the previous regulatory language could have implied that national trust banks were restricted to fiduciary activities only. The OCC had never interpreted it that way, and said so explicitly in the rulemaking. But the ambiguity existed in the text. The amendment removes it.
National trust banks have long held assets in non-fiduciary custody accounts. Those activities were always authorized. The new rule makes that authorization unambiguous and resistant to a future challenge based on regulatory text alone.
For the companies with pending applications, the timing is not incidental. Those whose business models center on custody, safekeeping, and non-fiduciary asset management now have explicit regulatory text supporting those operations, not just OCC interpretive letters that a future administration could revisit.
The Only Company That Has Actually Finished
Conditional approval and operational status are different things.
Anchorage Digital Bank is the only crypto-native company to have moved from OCC conditional approval to fully operational national trust bank status. Every other firm on the current list is still in process. Post-approval requirements include capital standards, compliance reviews, and ongoing examination cycles. The charter does not end the regulatory process. It begins a different, more demanding one.
The Federal Reserve question also remains unresolved. A national trust bank charter gives a company federal legitimacy and a single regulator. It does not automatically grant access to Fed payment rails, the infrastructure through which money actually moves in the US financial system. Fed Governor Chris Waller has said publicly he is exploring a streamlined account structure for newly chartered entities. No formal framework exists yet. Traditional banks have opposed expanded Fed access for these firms, and that opposition has not softened.
Why the Banking Industry Is Fighting Back on Two Fronts
Traditional banks are not watching this quietly. Their response has come on two tracks simultaneously.
The first track is the CLARITY Act. On March 5, 2026 the American Bankers Association formally rejected a White House compromise on the pending federal stablecoin legislation. The ABA's objection centered on a provision that would allow stablecoin issuers to offer yield on their tokens. The association argued the provision would let crypto firms operate with deposit-like products while avoiding the regulatory requirements that govern actual banks.
Analysts at Standard Chartered had previously estimated that such a provision, if enacted, could redirect up to $1 trillion in deposits away from traditional banks toward stablecoin products by 2028.
The second track is the charter process itself. The Conference of State Banking Supervisors warned that the OCC is combining different legal authorities in ways that may not survive a legal challenge. Its president described the resulting structure as a "Franken-charter," assembled from regulatory components not designed to work together.
The ABA separately pressed the OCC to slow its charter review process, arguing that federal approval should not function as a mechanism for companies to sidestep registration with the SEC, the CFTC, or other federal bodies with jurisdiction over digital assets.
These are coordinated, institutional objections. The banking lobby has resources and relationships on Capitol Hill that most of the applicant companies cannot match.
What the Numbers Actually Say
The companies in this wave are not small or speculative. Circle, Ripple, Paxos, BitGo, and Coinbase are among the most capitalized firms in the digital asset industry. Morgan Stanley and Fidelity are two of the largest financial institutions in the world. Payoneer processes cross-border payments for millions of businesses globally.
Their decision to pursue federal trust charters in the same narrow window reflects a shared calculation: the current regulatory posture in Washington is stable enough to justify the investment. That is a data point in itself. These companies are not hedging. They are committing legal and compliance resources to a permanent federal regulatory relationship.
The fintech industry's long-running argument that it deserved direct access to US banking infrastructure is, slowly and unglamorously, being resolved.
What Comes Next
Congress has not passed stablecoin legislation. The Fed has not resolved the payment rails question. The banking lobby has not stopped pushing.
The outcome will depend on whether the CLARITY Act passes with or without yield provisions, what the Fed decides about account access, and whether the Conference of State Banking Supervisors pursues the legal challenge it has signaled.
Eleven applications in eighty-three days is a starting point, not a conclusion.
Editor's note: We are committed to accuracy. If you spot an error, a missing detail, or have additional information about any of the companies or filings mentioned in this article, please email us at [email protected]. We will review and update promptly.
