Discover top fintech news and events!
Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter
Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more
JPMorgan Chase has notified several financial data aggregators that it will begin charging fees for access to customer information, marking a new stage in how major U.S. banks handle third-party data requests tied to fintech applications. The move affects intermediaries such as Plaid, Yodlee, and Finicity, which connect financial institutions to digital apps including payment, lending, and investing platforms.
This development reflects a change in JPMorgan’s approach to external data access and follows years of rising engagement between traditional banks and fintech firms over shared customer services. The firm cited operational costs and infrastructure demands, including fraud monitoring and security protocols, as part of the rationale for the new charges.
Background: Growing Volume of Data Requests and System Costs
JPMorgan has stated that its systems currently process approximately 2 billion account access requests each month. Many of these originate from aggregators retrieving data on behalf of consumers who use apps to track financial activity or transfer funds across institutions.
The bank’s annual technology budget for 2025 is $18 billion, a figure that surpasses the asset size of many mid-tier U.S. banks. This investment has supported updates to JPMorgan’s internal infrastructure, but interoperability with third-party platforms continues to generate technical and compliance-related expenses.
The company did not disclose how much it plans to charge aggregators, but any associated fees could influence the operating models of fintech platforms that rely on free or low-cost access to consumer data across financial institutions.
Implications for Fintech Firms and App Ecosystems
The planned charges are expected to apply to aggregators that facilitate account synchronization across apps including Venmo, Robinhood, and Rocket Money. These platforms often depend on seamless data access to deliver core services such as budget tracking, investing, and peer-to-peer payments.
Aggregators play a central role in the U.S. open banking ecosystem, acting as intermediaries between consumers, banks, and digital applications. Fees could introduce a new cost layer for some fintech firms, particularly those that serve users at low or no cost.
While no official pricing structure has been shared, the decision may prompt other large banks to adopt similar models. Industry analysts are monitoring whether additional institutions will implement access charges, potentially setting a precedent for broader data monetization in the U.S. financial sector.
Regulatory Landscape and Industry Pushback
The timing of JPMorgan’s move coincides with ongoing legal and regulatory debate over open banking frameworks in the United States. Unlike some jurisdictions with centralized data-sharing rules, U.S. banks are not currently required to offer standardized access mechanisms without charge.
The Bank Policy Institute, which represents major banks including JPMorgan, has challenged regulatory proposals that would limit the ability of banks to impose fees for customer data access. These proposals aim to establish open banking rules that guarantee consumer control and ease of access across financial platforms.
Critics of the fee model have raised concerns about potential restrictions on consumer choice and competitive fairness in the financial technology market. Some fintech representatives have argued that charging for access to data provided by the consumer may create barriers for innovation and limit the ability of smaller players to scale.
Strategic Considerations for JPMorgan
The decision to introduce fees comes amid broader competition between traditional banks and fintech platforms offering modular financial services. As more consumers adopt apps for budgeting, investing, or borrowing, the competitive landscape is shifting away from single-provider banking relationships.
Digital challengers often build from the ground up using cloud-native systems, while incumbent banks maintain older, layered infrastructures. JPMorgan’s investment in technology has aimed to modernize core functions, but maintaining control over data interfaces remains a key concern.
Revenue considerations are also at play. JPMorgan generated $34 billion in interchange fees last year from credit and debit card transactions. A migration toward electronic transfers, which typically generate lower or no fees, may reduce this stream. Limiting free data access could slow or alter that transition, preserving payment volume within the bank’s own ecosystem.
Consumer Impact and Market Outlook
How end users experience the changes may depend on how aggregators and app providers respond to the added costs. If providers absorb the fees, service continuity may be maintained. However, if costs are passed on or connections are limited, consumers could face disruptions in how they access financial tools or manage multi-account portfolios.
The development adds new complexity to the evolving open banking environment in the U.S., which remains fragmented compared to regions with formalized frameworks such as the United Kingdom or the European Union.
As large banks and fintech firms continue to define their boundaries and dependencies, data access policies are emerging as a key area of friction. JPMorgan’s new fee structure may influence future negotiations between aggregators and institutions and could factor into ongoing policy discussions at the federal level.
